We had a last class in 2010. We discussed Fukuyama's article.
Even if he is a political scientist, he wrote the essay about Bioethics.
Why did he do such a thing? Is it reliable? What is the connection between politics and Bioethics?
I think Bioehics has the crucial right about the future of human beings and politics.
In other words, the distiny of politics depends on the Bioethics.
Biothics can easily decide the direction of human beings, fo example, human cloning, so people must seriously consider about this problem.
As a result, Fukuyama wrote the essay about Bioethics.
I am against human cloning.
If we allow it, the life value of human will decrease, and then the murder will increase.
I think that people should follow the Mother Nature.
Cloning could increase the value of life as people would see clones are different from the original as their nurture was differentfrom the original. This could decrease murder rates. Either way can we prove these theories?
返信削除